Detailed statistics linked to sexual habits of total try and you will the three subsamples off energetic profiles, previous pages, and you may non-users
Becoming single reduces the number of unprotected full sexual intercourses
In regard to the number of partners with whom participants had protected full sex during the last year, the ANOVA revealed a significant difference between user groups (F(2, 1144) = , P 2 = , Cramer’s V = 0.15, P Figure 1 represents the theoretical model and the estimate coefficients. The model fit indices are the following: ? 2 = , df = 11, P 27 the fit indices of our model are not very satisfactory; however, the estimate coefficients of the model resulted statistically significant for several variables, highlighting interesting results and in line with the reference literature. In Table 4 , estimated regression weights are reported. The SEM output showed that being active or former user, compared to being non-user, has a positive statistically significant effect on the number of unprotected full sexual intercourses in the last 12 months. The same is for the age. All the other independent variables do not have a statistically significant impact.
Output of linear regression model typing group, dating applications need and you can objectives out-of set up variables as predictors getting what number of secure full sexual intercourse’ couples certainly productive users
Efficiency from linear regression design typing group, dating apps use and you will aim of installations details because predictors having exactly how many protected full sexual intercourse’ partners certainly one of effective pages
Hypothesis 2b A second multiple regression analysis was run to predict the number of unprotected full sex partners for active users. The number of unprotected full sex partners was set as the dependent variable, while the same demographic variables and dating apps usage and their motives for app installation variables used in the first regression analysis were entered as covariates. The final model accounted kissbridesdate.com verkkosivu for a significant proportion of the variance in the number of unprotected full sex partners among active users (R 2 = 0.16, Adjusted R 2 = 0.14, F-change(1, 260) = 4.34, P = .038). In contrast, looking for romantic partners or for friends, and being male were negatively associated with the number of unprotected sexual activity partners. Results are reported in Table 6 .
Searching for sexual people, several years of application usage, and being heterosexual was certainly regarding the amount of exposed full sex partners
Production off linear regression model typing group, dating apps incorporate and you can objectives out-of setting up variables since the predictors having what amount of exposed full sexual intercourse’ partners certainly one of energetic profiles
Searching for sexual people, numerous years of application utilization, and being heterosexual had been positively from the number of unprotected complete sex partners
Returns out of linear regression design entering group, relationships applications usage and you will purposes out-of installation details as predictors to possess exactly how many exposed complete sexual intercourse’ lovers one of active users
Hypothesis 2c A third multiple regression analysis was run, including demographic variables and apps’ pattern of usage variables together with apps’ installation motives, to predict active users’ hook-up frequency. The hook-up frequency was set as the dependent variable, while the same demographic variables and dating apps usage variables used in the previous regression analyses were entered as predictors. The final model accounted for a significant proportion of the variance in hook-up frequency among active users (R 2 = 0.24, Adjusted R 2 = 0.23, F-change(step one, 266) = 5.30, P = .022). App access frequency, looking for sexual partners, having a CNM relationship style were positively associated with the frequency of hook-ups. In contrast, being heterosexual and being of another sexual orientation (different from hetero and homosexual orientation) were negatively associated with the frequency of hook-ups. Results are reported in Table 7 .
